Consumer Complaint Against Mtnl Maintainable

We collected information about Consumer Complaint Against Mtnl Maintainable for you. There are links where you can find everything you need to know about Consumer Complaint Against Mtnl Maintainable.


Consumer courts continue to dismiss telecom complaints ...

    https://ultra.news/v-s/5651/consumer-courts-continue-to-dismiss-telecom-complaints-despite-government-clarification
    DoT, in its clarification, had said that just because a billing complaint against the Department of Telecom, which used to provide telephone facilities to consumers, has been dismissed under the act, telecom companies cannot seek refuge under the judgment and must be subjected to …

Consumer Complaint against BSNL? Jurisdiction is barred?

    https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/Consumer-Complaint-against-BSNL-Jurisdiction-is-barred--202351.asp
    Jun 22, 2011 · 22 June 2011 Consumer Forum can not take cognizance of consumer complaint against BSNL? jurisdiction is barred? It is mentioned that Apex Court has ruled "there is special remedy provided under Section 7(b) of Indian Telegarph Act regarding the disputes in respect of telephone bills,"

How to prepare and submit a Complaint to a Consumer Forum ...

    https://consumerresources.in/2012/09/20/how-to-prepare-and-submit-a-complaint-to-a-consumer-forum/
    How to prepare and submit a Complaint to a Consumer Forum. Of late, I have appeared before the Consumer Forums in Mumbai on behalf of several consumers. The procedure is simple, and the decision quite fast. I have received a few requests to detail the procedure for filing a Complaint.

Reserve Bank of India - Database

    https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/bs_viewcontent.aspx?Id=171
    Reserve Bank of India & others, CPR(1) 756 (SCDRC - Tamil Nadu. The complainant filed the a against the opposite party/appellant under section 2(1)g, 14,19of consumer protection Act for deficiency in banking service .It was held that the bank advanced loans to the complaints who are agriculturist and who wanted to install lift irrigation system.

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

    http://ncdrc.nic.in/
    The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), India is a quasi-judicial commission in India which was set up in 1988 under the Consumer …

TELEPHONE SERVICES AND CONSUMER FORUM

    https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/experts/TELEPHONE-SERVICES-AND-CONSUMER-FORUM-188966.asp
    May 12, 2011 · " the complaint of an individual consumer maintainable before a Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986)" ... or even against the BSNL and MTNL (if not already referred to arbitration ...

Hathway India's Best Digital Cable Tv and Broadband ...

    https://www.hathway.com/Broadband/AppellateAuthority
    Appeals only against the decision of the Nodal Officer are maintainable before the Appellate Authority, no other appeal/direct complaint shall be entertained. For detailed procedure on disposal of appeals by Appellate Authority please refer the TRAI Regulation on Consumer Protection and Redressal for Grievances (3 of 2007)

Star India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Society of Catalysts Latest ...

    https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/judgments/announcement.php?WID=12565
    Hence, Respondent No. 1, which is a consumer society (hereinafter "the complainant"), filed a complaint before the National Commission against Star India and Airtel (but not against BSNL and MTNL), contending that they were committing an 'unfair trade practice' within the meaning of Section 2(1)(r)(3)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ...

STAR INDIA (P) LTD. vs. SOCIETY OF CATALYSTS

    https://www.latestlaws.com/latest-caselaw/2020/january/2020-latest-caselaw-71-sc/
    Hence, Respondent No. 1, which is a consumer society (hereinafter "the complainant"), filed a complaint before the National Commission against Star India and Airtel (but not against BSNL and MTNL), contending that they were committing an `unfair trade practice' within the meaning of section 2(1)(r)(3)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ...

consumer protection act (CPA) - SlideShare

    https://www.slideshare.net/RadhikaAgrawal3/consumer-protection-act-cpa-43546987
    Jan 15, 2015 · COMPLAINT! • An aggrieved consumer seeks redressal under the Act through the instrumentality of complaint. • It does not mean that the consumer can complain against his each and every problem. The Act has provided certain grounds on which complaint can be made. • Goods have defects. • Services have deficiency.

Society of Catalysts v Star Plus TV, Star India Pvt. Ltd ...

    https://www.lawyerservices.in/Society-of-Catalysts-Versus-Star-Plus-TV-Star-India-Pvt-Ltd-and-Another-2008-09-11
    Sep 11, 2008 · M.B. SHAH, J., PRESIDENT The Society of Catalysts, a voluntary consumer organisation, has filed this complaint against the alleged unfair trade practices adopted by Opposite Party (OP) No. 1, Star Plus TV and OP No. 2, Bharti Airtel Ltd. …

Airtel & Star Plus TV directed to pay damages on KBC's ...

    https://www.indiaconsumerforum.org/airtel-star-plus-tv-directed-to-pay-damages-on-kbcs-har-seat-hot-seat-contest/
    Nov 09, 2014 · In the present case, numerous consumers have not approached us but a voluntary consumer association has filed this complaint and it is specifically provided under section 14-B of the TRAI Act that such a complaint is maintainable before the consumer fora. CONCLUSION. In view of the foregoing discussion, the complaint is allowed partly.

KBC: No unfair practice by Star India, Airtel: Penalty not ...

    https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/kbc-no-unfair-practice-star-india-airtel-penalty-not-leviable-sc.html
    Jan 26, 2020 · Hence, Respondent No. 1, which is a consumer society (hereinafter “the complainant”), filed a complaint before the National Commission against Star India and Airtel (but not against BSNL and MTNL), contending that they were committing an ‘unfair trade practice’ within the meaning of Section 2(1)(r)(3)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act ...

Star India(P) Ltd. vs Society Of Catalysts . on 23 January ...

    https://indiankanoon.org/doc/176879321/
    Hence, Respondent No. 1, 2 which is a consumer society (hereinafter “the complainant”), filed a complaint before the National Commission against Star India and Airtel (but not against BSNL and MTNL), contending that they were committing an ‘unfair trade practice’ within the meaning of Section 2(1)(r)(3)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act ...

mynation.net

    https://mynation.net/judgments/star-india-p-ltd-vs-society-of-catalysts23-01-2020/
    useful 498a judgments of high courts and supreme court of india

Star India(p) Ltd. Vs Society of Catalysts . - Legal Authority

    https://www.legalauthority.in/judgement/star-india-p-ltd-vs-society-of-catalysts-41675
    Jan 23, 2020 · Commission”) allowing the consumer complaint filed by Respondent No. 1 in both these appeals against the Appellants. 1. 2. 2. The brief facts giving rise to these appeals are as follows: 2.1 Star India (P) Ltd., the Appellant in C.A. No. 6597/2008

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) — ATM TRANSACTION FAILED

    https://www.consumercomplaints.in/reserve-bank-of-india-rbi-atm-transaction-failed-c1032670
    Consumer complaints and reviews about Reserve Bank of India (RBI) - ATM TRANSACTION FAILED. Reserve Bank of India (RBI) contact information and services description. We use cookies to improve your experience on our site and to show you personalised advertising.1/5(1)

4. Respondents-complainants in the State Commission, filed ...

    https://advocatemmmohan.wordpress.com/2012/04/04/4-respondents-complainants-in-the-state-commission-filed-a-complaint-against-appellants-opposite-parties-stating-that-respondent-no-1-is-a-retired-employee-of-a-public-limited-company-a/
    Apr 04, 2012 · 4. Respondents-complainants in the State Commission, filed a complaint against appellants- opposite parties stating that respondent no.1 is a retired employee of a Public Limited Company and respondent no.2 is his wife. They invested their hard earned money with appellant no.1 for purchasing and trading shares.

CIVIL APPEAL NO 6597 AND 6645 OF 2008 - STAR INDIA (P) LTD ...

    https://www.indianlawsinfo.com/Home/CaseDetail/SC/CIVIL-APPEAL-NO-6597-AND-6645-OF-2008
    which is a consumer society (hereinafter “the complainant”), filed a complaint before the National Commission against Star India and Airtel (but not against BSNL and MTNL), contending that they were committing an ‘unfair trade practice’ within the meaning of Section 2(1)(r)(3)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the 1986 Act”).



Searching for Consumer Complaint Against Mtnl Maintainable information?

To find needed information please click on the links to visit sites with more detailed data.

Related Complaint Info